This article appeared in the November 2014 issue of Support World
In our roles in Service Management we come up with solutions and solve problems on a regular basis. It’s part of our job and we are quite good at it. There are times, however, when a new problem arises and the usual solutions simply don’t work. The problem could be technical, an inefficient work process, a staffing issue, or the need for a strategic approach because the standard methods are ineffective. In those situations we need to innovate. The challenge is that our normal thought patterns often don’t promote the use of our creative abilities. They tend to confine us. To get better solutions we need to think differently.
Our default thought patterns use linear or convergent thinking. This way of thinking converges, step by step, taking a linear path to a single answer. Convergent or linear thinking works great for math problems and any situation where there is only one correct answer. Linear thinking is essential in daily activities and very important, since we often experience repeat problems where new solutions are not necessary. For new or difficult problems, innovation is needed which requires thoughts on a different plane, using non-linear or divergent thinking.
The word divergent is derived from the Latin divergere, meaning ‘to go in different directions’. Divergent thinking provides the freedom to branch out and explore many possible answers or solutions. That might sound easy, but we are inhibited by what Roger Von Oech calls ‘Ten Mental Locks’ in his book on creativity, ‘A Whack on the Side of the Head’. Von Oech describes how these ‘locks’ keep us from tapping our creative potential. For example, he explains how the lock he calls ‘Follow the Rules’ confines us to conventional approaches, the lock ‘Don’t Be Foolish’ keeps us from using our imagination, and the lock ‘I’m Not Creative’ traps us into believing we can’t come up with better ideas.
Here is the full list:
1. The Right Answer
2. That’s Not Logical
3. Follow the Rules
4. Be Practical
5. Play is Frivolous
6. That’s Not My Area
7. Don’t Be Foolish
8. Avoid Ambiguity
9. To Err is Wrong
10. I’m Not Creative
Von Oech contends that we are limited by these ‘locks’ so frequently that we don’t even realize it.
As you read this list you may identify a time when they constrained your thinking. The first one screams ‘convergent thinking’, seeking that single answer. Number 9, ‘To Err is Wrong’ is rather ironic, as some notable inventions (x-rays, penicillin, Post It notes, ink jet printers, and plastic) were discovered as a result of mistakes. The most unfortunate lock on the list is ‘I’m Not Creative’ because it is universally wrong. Most scientific sources estimate that the average human brain contains approximately 100 billion neurons with the potential for 100 trillion connections. With that many connections, every one of us has incredible potential for generating ideas. So, we all have the ability to create innovative solutions if we just give ourselves permission to think differently.
When asked what single event was most helpful in developing the Theory of Relativity, Albert Einstein replied “Figuring out how to think about the problem.”
Many great solutions wouldn’t have been possible using linear thinking alone because the concepts required taking a creative ‘leap’, not using pure logic. For example, on a sunny day in 1944, Edwin Land was on vacation with his family in New Mexico. They were taking pictures of the scenic landscape, and his 3 year old daughter wanted to know when they could see the pictures. At that time, of course, cameras used film that needed to be developed in a lab. Land explained to his daughter that they needed to wait until they got home to have the pictures developed. His daughter, like any child, asked “Why?” He reiterated his explanation several times, but she was completely bewildered, asking “Why do we have to wait?” She insisted that she should be able to see the pictures right away.
Later that day, Land took a long walk and pondered the problem of having to wait to see the pictures. He then allowed himself the freedom to imagine a scenario where the pictures could be seen instantly. He took a creative leap and assumed it was possible. Back at work, he began exploring different approaches. He ultimately invented self-developing film, and the Polaroid Land camera was born. That camera made it possible to take pictures and see them ‘right away’ and was an incredibly successful product. Not knowing the ‘rules’ of photography, Edwin Land’s daughter caused him to alter his thinking, and he revolutionized picture taking habits around the world.
This example shows how thinking differently can lead to a great invention, but how can the average person create better solutions? First, you need a problem statement. It should be concise and clear so even people unfamiliar with the situation understand the problem. Second, you need to take a ‘creative leap’. Figure 1 illustrates the creative process as seen by Edward de Bono, considered the ‘father of creative thinking’. The key to getting better solutions is to avoid being constrained by conventional thinking and shifting to a higher plane, even if the idea initially seems impossible or strange. Years ago in Japan, grocery stores could not carry enough watermelons to keep up with demand. The large round fruit took up too much space in the size constrained stores. The problem was ‘watermelons take up too much space’.
Figure 1
Then, a farmer on the island of Shikoku had the crazy idea of growing watermelons in a different shape. Through experimentation he found a way to grow the plants in clear square containers. As the fruit grew, it conformed to the shape of the container. Square watermelons are now very popular in Japan because stores can carry more fruit and consumers can fit them more easily in their refrigerators. As with many inventions, taking that leap means imagining a solution that initially seems farfetched. The Wright brothers’ notion that a flying machine was possible is a good example. They were widely ridiculed for their idea because it seemed foolish. Projecting the end state by taking that creative leap must happen before you begin to figure out how to fill in the steps required to achieve it.
“The best way to have a good idea is to have a lot of ideas” – Linus Pauling
One way to cultivate the leap is to frame the problem and brainstorm. Brainstorming involves generating as many ideas as possible without any judgment, and encourages building on others’ ideas. The wilder the ideas the better because even if they are not feasible, they open up additional avenues of thought. Most people believe they have brainstormed before, but over many years of facilitating such sessions, I’ve found that true brainstorming is rare. Those ‘mental locks’ creep in and people need strong encouragement to let their imaginations loose. People seem especially inhibited if anyone higher on the management chain is in the room.
While delivering a session on this topic at the HDI 2014 conference in Orlando, I asked how many people had done true brainstorming while their boss was in the room. More than half the room raised their hands. With their hands still in the air, I asked how many of those people had suggested an idea that was illegal or against their company policy. Every hand dropped immediately, accompanied by gales of laughter. When I asked why, the response was that those types of ideas would be frowned upon. In other words, they would feel judged, and if there is any judgment it is not true brainstorming.

Figure 2
The next slide in my presentation showed an example of how typical their experience was, using brainstormed results from another session I had facilitated. The problem statement was ‘High School band from Maine wants to participate in the Rose Bowl parade (held in Pasadena, California) but has no transportation or funding’. Figure 2 shows the ideas that were brainstormed. On the left are the first ten ideas the group generated. They’re practical, but not very innovative. I paused the session and encouraged them to give me some really crazy ideas and to consciously ignore the ‘Ten Mental Locks’. You can see that the ideas on the right are much more innovative and actually include things that are illegal. No one’s going to actually rob a bank or steal buses, but those crazy ideas could help surface legal ways to get the intended result. Maybe they could borrow buses or get a bank to partner with them on a fundraising effort. With so many different ideas, brainstorming allows combining ideas to create solutions. If I had not encouraged those crazy ideas I am sure the rest of their answers would have been safer, and probably not very creative.
Brainstorming doesn’t have to generate crazy ideas to be helpful. Near the end of my session in Orlando, we brainstormed solutions to problem statements submitted by the audience. One statement, ‘staffing gaps due to high turnover in temporary workers’, had more than a dozen potential solutions offered by the group in less than a minute. The temporary workers were students who left significant gaps when they went back to school. The person who submitted the problem stated that several of the ideas she heard were worth exploring. In particular, the suggestion to hire retired service desk staff on a part time basis to bridge those gaps was most appealing. Although this idea may not seem particularly innovative, it was an idea her company had not considered.
Another way to generate ideas is called a radial outline, a technique from The Creative Problem Solver’s Toolbox, by Richard Fobes. This involves putting the problem statement at the bottom of a page and then creating branches of ideas emanating upward by asking ‘how’ questions. Figure 3 depicts the beginning stages of a radial outline for the problem statement, ‘Neighbor’s chickens are eating your garden vegetables’ from Fobes’ book. The first ‘how?’ identifies two general approaches: ‘deal with chickens’ and ‘deal with neighbors’. From there, additional ‘how?’ questions help spawn more specific ideas as the branches radiate upward. Looking at the diagram, you can see how one thought might act as a catalyst for others. With additional branches, more innovative ideas can surface. The full version of a radial outline can have four or five dozen branches. Some of the best ideas can be found at the top.
Figure 3
We have touched on brainstorming and radial outline; two tools that can help generate innovative ideas. If you search the internet for ‘thinking tools’, you will find an abundance of others. Many of these tools can be used by individuals or groups. In large group settings, a skilled facilitator might be needed to get the best results. Creating a non-threatening environment with no judgment is essential to promote the freedom for people to ‘branch out’ in their thinking.
The advancement in technology we see on a continuing basis clearly illustrates that better solutions are out there. Some just have not been discovered yet. So, when you encounter a situation where the standard approach is not getting the results you need, don’t fret. View it as an opportunity. It doesn’t matter if it’s a technical problem, a process issue, or a staffing dilemma. Remember that we all have tremendous capacity to generate great ideas once we give ourselves permission. Edward de Bono said, “Creativity involves breaking out of established patterns in order to look at things in a different way”. Craft your problem statement and select a tool. Then, branch out, unlock your thinking, and take that creative leap. You’ll be pleasantly surprised with the ideas and solutions you can generate by thinking differently.